debate

Discussion of literary studies and theoretical texts relevant to contemporary French literature.

Lesbian literature as a method: on Lou Lootgieter's subjective cartography of the hidden

Lou Lootgieters Sammlung "Les Dessous lesbiens de la littérature" (2026) zeigt anhand von 29 frankophonen Texten seit dem 19. Jahrhundert eine bewusst subjektive, nicht-chronologische Kartographie lesbischer Schreibweisen, die journalistische Recherche, Interviews und close readings verbindet. Im Zentrum stehen wiederkehrende Strategien, mit denen Autorinnen lesbisches Begehren unter Bedingungen von Zensur und Unsichtbarkeit artikulieren: So liest Lootgieter Rachildes "Monsieur Vénus" (1884) als frühe Figuration von „Monstrosität“ als Chiffre eines noch sprachlosen Begehrens, während sie in Monique Wittigs "L’Opoponax" (1964) die grammatische Neutralisierung von Geschlecht als literarisches „Trojanisches Pferd“ interpretiert. An Beispielen wie Amélie Nothombs "Stupeur et tremblements" (1999), dessen homoerotische Spannung von der zeitgenössischen Kritik ignoriert wurde, oder Violette Leducs zensierter Internatserzählung "Thérèse et Isabelle" zeigt der Band, wie stark Rezeption und Publikationsgeschichte zur Unsichtbarmachung beitragen. Zugleich verschiebt sich die Perspektive im Verlauf der vier Kapitel von Verschleierungstechniken hin zu offenen politischen Positionen, etwa in Constance Debrés "Love Me Tender" (2020), das Heterosexualität als soziales Regime explizit zurückweist. Theoretische Bezugspunkte – von Judith Butler über Monique Wittig bis zu Paul B. Preciado – bleiben dabei bewusst fragmentarisch und werden eher als Resonanzraum denn als systematischer Rahmen eingesetzt. Zudem werden quer dazu auch das Verhältnis zu männlicher Homosexualität, innerfeministische Konfliktlinien sowie Fragen von Transinklusion und -exklusion punktuell mitverhandelt. Die Rezension arbeitet diese Spannungen zwischen Materialfülle und fehlender methodischer Synthese ebenso heraus wie den Erkenntniswert des Bandes als Fundus bislang marginalisierter Texte, Rezeptionsdokumente und Gesprächsperspektiven für die literaturwissenschaftliche Weiterarbeit.

➙ To the article

Marine Le Pen as a book character: Revealing, Interpreting, Imagining

This overview of Marine Le Pen literature is overshadowed by an ongoing court case: On the 7th... Juli 2026 verkündet die Pariser Cour d'appel ihr Urteil im Prozess um die Assistenten der FN-Europaabgeordneten, in dem Marine Le Pen erstinstanzlich zu fünf Jahren Verlust des passiven Wahlrechts mit sofortiger Vollstreckung verurteilt worden war – eine Entscheidung, deren Bestätigung sie von der Präsidentschaftswahl 2027 ausschließen und den Weg für Jordan Bardella als Ersatzkandidaten des Rassemblement National ebnen würde, während eine Abschwächung oder Aufhebung der sofortigen Vollstreckung ihre Kandidatur offen hielte; da das Urteil zum Zeitpunkt der Abfassung noch aussteht, erhält die folgende Übersicht eine besondere Gegenwartsdringlichkeit. – The review follows a dual order: on the one hand, a logic of genre, on the other hand, an argumentative progression from the visible to the structural. The first section is dedicated to several journalistic exposé books that, through intensive research, reveal networks, finances, and internal party strategies. Here, the review shows in detail how these texts work with recurring dramaturgical devices: They open with concise scenes – such as election campaign appearances or internal crisis moments – in order to then gradually unfold a counter-image to the public staging. The politician figure appears as a strategically controlled construct, whose "normalization" is described as a conscious operation. The review highlights that these books achieve their impact less through new facts than through their narrative framing: they organize the material along a logic of revelation that always aims to expose a discrepancy between surface and depth. – A second section is dedicated to discourse-analytical and ideology-critical studies. Here the focus shifts: Instead of biographical details, language patterns, shifts in terminology and rhetorical strategies are at the center. The review reconstructs the lines of argumentation in these works: They show, for example, how terms such as "people", "sovereignty" or "security" are semantically recoded, how ambivalent formulations serve different addressees at the same time, and how older right-wing extremist discourses continue in a more moderate form. The methodological rigor of these studies, which employ corpus analyses, speech comparisons, and historical contextualizations, is particularly emphasized. The figure of Le Pen no longer appears here as an acting subject, but as an effect of a discourse that transcends her. – This is followed by a section on biographical accounts that are more narrative and psychological in nature. The review shows how these books condense central themes – family conflicts, the relationship with the father, the generational change within the party – into a coherent life story. The analysis highlights that the biographies often employ literary techniques: they rely on dramatic intensification, character development, and symbolic key scenes. The politician figure gains depth and definition here, but at the same time is embedded in familiar narrative patterns that make his political role understandable and narratable. – Another part of the review is dedicated to programmatic writings and political essays, either by Le Pen herself or from her circle. Here, the review analyzes the internal structure of these texts: the construction of a collective subject ("the people"), the juxtaposition of threat and protection, and the staging of political clarity through seemingly simple solutions. The argument demonstrates that these writings do not so much develop concrete policy proposals as offer a coherent worldview in which the author appears as a necessary representative. – Finally, the review discusses forecasts, election studies, and fictional texts that anticipate a possible presidency. Particularly instructive here is the observation that statistical models and literary imaginings are converging: both transform the political figure into a future figure whose possibility is already conceived as reality. The review shows how these texts explore scenarios, design government constellations and anticipate political decisions – thereby shifting the imaginable. – The argumentative line of the review is to consider these different text types not in isolation, but as part of a shared cultural production process. In their combined view, “Marine Le Pen” emerges as a multifaceted figure who, depending on the perspective, is revealed, analyzed, narrated, programmed or imagined. It is precisely this overlap that constitutes their political effectiveness. – Against this background, the pending judgment takes on a weight that goes far beyond the individual legal question: its consequences not only affect French domestic politics and the constellation of the 2027 presidential election, but extend into Franco-German relations – for example, in questions of economic and European policy coordination – and touch upon the political architecture of Europe as a whole, insofar as it could readjust the balance of power between national populist and integration-oriented projects.

➙ To the article

Holy Saturday without resurrection: Michel Houellebecq and disenchanted Christianity

"Noël raté. Le christianisme désenchanté de Michel Houellebecq," edited by Stephan Leopold and Noëlle Miller, brings together twelve essays and a postscript that read Houellebecq's work from diverse perspectives as an engagement with a continuing Christianity stripped of its assurance of salvation. Starting with the Christmas motif as a cipher for failure, the essays unfold an interpretive field ranging from questions of authorship and performativity to the religious structure of consumer capitalism and the problem of social cohesion, culminating in the themes of love, compassion, and transcendence. The volume combines literary, philosophical, and cultural sociological approaches to a coherent interpretation of the oeuvre as a "Holy Saturday without resurrection," in which Christian forms and symbols persist without being redeemed by any positive content of faith. Despite some redundancies and a sometimes extensive Christological typology, the collection opens up an interpretatively ambitious and methodologically diverse perspective on the religious content of Houellebecq's work and at the same time formulates questions that are important for the analysis of contemporary forms of literary disenchantment beyond Houellebecq research.

➙ To the article

Virtue, the people, and terror before the 2027 presidential elections: Jean-Luc Mélenchon, Robespierre, and the legacy of the revolution

This article analyzes the political and intellectual connection between presidential candidate Jean-Luc Mélenchon and Maximilien Robespierre, the Jacobin revolutionary and architect of the Reign of Terror, and demonstrates how central motifs of Jacobin thought—particularly the concept of "vertu" as a republican virtue, the idea of ​​a homogeneous popular will, and the stark contrast between the people and corruption—continue to perpetuate themselves in Mélenchon's political project for La France insoumise. Starting with the ambivalent figure of Robespierre, poised between the ideal of virtue and the Reign of Terror, the text reconstructs the historiographical traditions of interpretation and their current political relevance in France. It becomes clear that Mélenchon's power to mobilize, as well as his polarizing influence, stems from a structural tension: the attempt to reconcile moral purity with democratic representation. The article combines political theory, intellectual history and literary reflection, and understands the ongoing debate surrounding Robespierre as a key to understanding the current crisis and self-interpretation of the French left.

➙ To the article

Jewish-Arab coexistence as a family chronicle: Pierre Hazan

Pierre Hazan's "Les Juifs, les Arabes, ma famille et moi" (2026) unfolds a project that is both literary and historiographical, using a sprawling family history as its framework. In seven genealogically organized chapters, the book reconstructs the vanished reality of Jewish-Arab coexistence in the Eastern Mediterranean and contrasts it with the hardened identity logics of the 20th century. Starting with figures such as a 19th-century Sephardic rabbi, an Egyptian nationalist and Zionist, and the last Jewish voices in Egypt, Hazan combines archival material, fragments of memory, and contemporary encounters with Israeli and Palestinian actors. From this, he develops three central theses: that coexistence was historically lived practice, that its destruction stems from competing nationalisms, and that the mutually repressed traumas—the expulsion of Jews from Arab countries and the Nakba—are inextricably intertwined. The book thus sees itself as an intervention in the politics of memory of the present and as a plea to rethink hybridity not as an exception, but as a lost historical normality.

➙ To the article

When might replaces right: Bruno Le Maire

"Le temps d'une décision" (Gallimard, 2026) is both a memoir and a diagnosis of global politics: Drawing on twenty-five years in the highest French government offices, Bruno Le Maire distills the unsettling question of who will still be making decisions in the present day of 2025/2026 – and answers it pessimistically. From a citizen's refusal to shake hands in Chamonix to the negotiating tables with Trump, Putin, and Xi, he traces the transition from a rules-based order, exemplified by France in 2003 with its veto against the Iraq War, to a post-war world in which "force has replaced law" and decision-making has migrated from nations and multilateral institutions into the hands of autocrats, tech oligarchs, and financial giants. This article does not merely read this book as a political polemic, but rather reveals its true point in its form: Le Maire does not simply assert his thesis, he stages it – through novella-like scenes, incisive portraits, and leitmotifs such as the Starlink antenna above the roof of his country house. The article's argument unfolds along five interpenetrating axes of interpretation, from the anatomy of the inability to decide, through self-justification in the debt crisis, to a wake-up call for Europe, culminating in a pointed thesis: that literary form itself becomes the answer to the diagnosed problem in Le Maire's work – where no one "really" decides anymore – storytelling promises the coherence that politics has lost. Thus, the much-vaunted "livre de vérité" proves to be a work whose claim to truth and fictional devices exist in a productive, deliberately calculated tension.

➙ To the article

The intimate as a political technique: Theses on Édouard Louis

This article reads Édouard Louis's work as a coherent poetics project and explores how his texts transcend the boundaries between autobiographical narrative, sociological analysis, and political intervention. Starting with the concepts of "confrontational literature" and "intimism," which Louis develops in his recent collection of conversations, "Que faire de la littérature?" (2025), ten interpretive approaches are presented that illuminate the formal procedures, thematic constants, and strategic shifts in his writing. At its core is the question of whether, over the course of his work, one can observe a maturation of the author or rather a refinement of his literary means—and how Louis, through his texts, aims not only to narrate but also to compel his readers to see what they all too easily repress.

➙ To the article

Boualem Sansal's "Le Village de l'Allemand" between memory culture and postcolonial text

This essay is explicitly not a review of Sansal's prison journal "La Légende: libres méditations d'un prisonnier encombrant" (Grasset, 2026), and it will briefly explain why such a review is being omitted for the time being. The book is an autobiographical account of imprisonment that sees itself as a "livre de combat" and is still so densely entangled in current polemics, publishing conflicts, and friend-or-foe balances that its literary character is almost inseparable from the noise surrounding it. Instead of prematurely dissecting the book, this essay uses it as an opportunity to refer to the earlier novel "Le Village de l'Allemand" (Gallimard, 2008)—thus postponing, for the time being, an interpretive engagement with "La Légende." The novel "Le Village de l'Allemand" is a "roman croisé" that not only thematizes the in-between but elevates it to a writing method. Using the intertwined diaries of the Schiller brothers, the isotopy of the "village" across four spaces of death, the chronological symmetry of massacre and suicide, and the shifting metaphor of camps, he shows how the novel folds three spaces of memory—the Shoah, the Algerian Civil War, and the French banlieue—into one another, conceiving of guilt never as a fixed front, but as staggered, translatable, and never entirely resolvable. Two key passages from Rachel's diary frame the reading and simultaneously serve as a thoughtful foil for "La Légende": The novelist, who once explored the difference between bearing witness and settling scores in literary form, reminds us how fragile the position of the just remains.

➙ To the article

Montaigne in the dock: Philippe Desan

The novel by renowned Montaigne scholar Philippe Desan, "Montaigne – La Boétie: une ténébreuse affaire" (2024), recounts the most famous friendship of the French Renaissance as a literary crime story. Starting with the encounter between Montaigne and Étienne de La Boétie in 16th-century Bordeaux, the novel develops the provocative hypothesis that Montaigne himself may have been responsible for his friend's early death. Following the trail of a lost sonnet, hidden documents, and a modern academic investigation, Desan traces the paths of tradition to the present day, making the reconstruction of the past the central focus of his narrative. This essay demonstrates that this historical crime novel is far more than a scholarly game: it represents a fictional reflection on the possibilities and limitations of Montaigne research and, in doing so, implicitly engages with Hugo Friedrich's humanist interpretation of Montaigne. While Friedrich, in his classic 1949 monograph, emphasizes the unity of a “highly organized mind” and the consubstantiality of life and work, Desan portrays a Montaigne whose identity, texts, and memories are shaped by historical interests, editorial interventions, and social strategies. The essay argues that Desan’s novel deliberately blurs the line between scholarship and fiction in order to reveal the fundamental narrative nature of all interpretation: reading here appears as working with clues, probabilities, and hypotheses, so that the story of a possible crime simultaneously becomes a reflection on the conditions of literary scholarship.

➙ To the article

The missing work: Xavier Garnier and Mohamed Mbougar Sarr in dialogue

Xavier Garnier's "Quels lieux pour les littératures en langues africaines?" and Mohamed Mbougar Sarr's novel "La plus secrète mémoire des hommes" both revolve around the question of under what conditions African literature becomes visible—and what happens to writers who defy the expectations of the French literary establishment. In his study, Garnier reconstructs the suppressed history of African-language literatures and shows how strongly Francophone texts are influenced by languages ​​such as Wolof, Gikũyũ, and Kiswahili, even though these languages ​​mostly remain invisible in the international literary scene. Sarr explores the same issue as a literary quest: The young Senegalese author Diégane Latyr Faye follows the trail of the enigmatic T.C. Elimane, whose celebrated 1938 novel disappears after fierce racist and exoticizing reactions. The essay reads both books as complementary counterparts: Garnier's theoretical concepts—such as literature as an "ecosystem" of languages, places, and institutions—make it clear why Elimane is simultaneously admired and excluded in the novel, while Sarr translates Garnier's abstract considerations into concrete scenes, such as the fictional Parisian newspaper reviews or the multilingual passages in Wolof and Serer. The analysis is particularly strong where it shows that African authors in the Francophone world still find themselves caught between two contradictory expectations: the need to be both "authentically African" and literarily universal. It is precisely from this tension that the essay develops a precise and vivid interpretation of Sarr's novel as a reflection on literary recognition, linguistic belonging, and the possibility of writing under postcolonial conditions.

➙ To the article

Huysmans as a seismograph of modernity: Agnès Michaux

Agnès Michaux's novel trilogy "La fabrication des chiens" (The Making of Dogs) and her later biography of Joris-Karl Huysmans together form an extraordinary double project: a literary reconstruction of the fin de siècle and, at the same time, a fresh look at Huysmans as a seismograph of modernity. The first volume of the trilogy (1889) follows the young provincial journalist Louis Daumale through Paris during the Exposition Universelle, the opening of the Eiffel Tower, and the enthusiasm for progress, while beneath the glittering surface, nationalism, eugenics, social anxiety, and cultural exhaustion are already becoming visible. At the heart of the story is Daumale's encounter with Huysmans, who appears not as a museum-like icon of decadence, but as a radically honest diagnostician of his time: "unjust, sometimes only, but with complete sincerity." Michaux's argument is that decadence should be read not as a pose, but as a precise diagnosis of civilization. Des Esseintes from "À rebours" is not understood as an aesthetic ideal, but rather as a symptom of a society whose sensory overload and artificiality deform humanity. This idea is reflected in the titular motif of the "fabrication" of dogs: optimization, breeding, and social conditioning become a metaphor for a modernity that standardizes all living things. In her biography, Michaux further radicalizes this approach by reading Huysmans not intrinsically, but physically and socially—as a shivering, nervous civil servant whose art arises from physical hypersensitivity, urban weariness, and uncompromising truthfulness. Thus, the result is not a nostalgic image of the Belle Époque, but an analysis of modernity itself: for Michaux, 1889 appears as that historical tipping point where progress and decay, rationalization and spiritual yearning, surface and inner turmoil become inextricably intertwined.

➙ To the article

Marc Bloch in the Pantheon: Historian, resistance fighter, martyr of the Republic

On June 23, 2026, Marc Bloch will be interred in the Panthéon—82 years after the Gestapo shot him near Lyon and left his body in the ditch. This text attempts to understand the significance of this gesture: for France, which honors in Bloch a citizen whose civil and academic rights were once curtailed by the French state; for Germany, which must recognize in him a victim of its own state power; and for the discipline of history, which, for the first time, sees one of its own entering the nation's temple. He was a medievalist and an officer, founder of the Annales and a resistance fighter, a man who treated the self-evident as requiring explanation and who never abandoned the truth, even when it cost him his life. What holds his works together, from the "Rois thaumaturges" to the unfinished "Apologie," is less a method than an attitude: the refusal to tell history from within a single community. He chose "dilexit veritatem" – he loved the truth – as his epitaph. The Republic is now giving him the answer he did not receive in 1940.

➙ To the article

Between Glue and Life: A Phenomenology of the Book

Michel Jullien's "Le Format d'un livre" (Verdier, 2026) unfolds a phenomenology of the book that is as precise as it is sensuously rich, starting not with the text but with the object: the weight of the pages, the smell of the paper, the posture of the reading hands. In loosely connected, narratively grounded chapters, Jullien combines miniatures of book history—from the dépôt légal of the Renaissance to the typography of the Pléiade—with autobiographical scenes and ethnographically precise observations of reading as a physical practice. The book thus appears as a unique kind of time receptacle: it stores not only texts but also traces of lived experience—fingerprints, found objects, wear and tear—and derives its meaning from the interplay of material, form, use, and memory. Jullien's essay therefore moves beyond classical genres, between object description, cultural history, and self-narration, vividly demonstrating that the book speaks even before it is read.

➙ To the article

Society in a mode of fragmentation – literature as a response to the crisis of representation: Robert Lukenda

Robert Lukenda's study, "Representing Society in the Age of Singularities: Narrative Responses to France's Contemporary Crisis of Representation," is a comprehensive analysis of how contemporary French literature responds to the experience that "society" as a coherent whole has become increasingly elusive. Starting with scenes such as Annie Ernaux's ethnographic view of the supermarket or Éric Vuillard's reconstruction of nameless revolutionary actors, Lukenda demonstrates that literature intervenes precisely where political and media discourses distort or fail to capture social reality. In a first, broad theoretical section, he unfolds France's historical and contemporary crisis of representation—from the tension between the republican claim to unity and social inequality to the fragmentation into "France périphérique" and metropolises—before analyzing literary responses in the second part: autosociobiographical self-examinations (Ernaux, Eribon), documentary reconstructions (Vuillard), collective narrative projects ("Raconter la vie"), and serial formats. The review argues that Lukenda convincingly defines literature as a medium of "mediation" that makes social relations visible where classical forms of representation fail; at the same time, it critically emphasizes that this literature often privileges the perspective of the "invisible," while elites, political institutions, and inherent aesthetic logics remain underexposed. These works create an image of a France that only inadequately describes itself—and of a literature that makes this gap visible without being able to fully close it.

➙ To the article

War as a legacy: On the systematics of transgenerational imprinting in the work of Julia Weidmann

This review presents Julia Weidmann's study "Continuum of Wars: Intergenerational Narratives of the World Wars in Contemporary French Literature" (Winter, 2025) as a fundamental, comparative investigation of a central phenomenon in contemporary French literature: the intergenerational narration of the World Wars. The starting point is the observation that subsequent generations—from the "wound" generation to the "inheritance" generation—reconstruct familial wartime experiences in literary form, mediating between archival research and imagination. To this end, Weidmann develops an original model of a "war continuum" that replaces traditional numerical generational categories with a metaphorical, trauma-oriented scale, and operationalizes this concept in a four-stage analytical method, which she applies to a broad corpus of authors (including Claude Simon, Patrick Modiano, Ivan Jablonka, and Anne Berest). The review particularly praises the methodological clarity, the nuanced close readings, and the identification of recurring narrative structures across generations, but also highlights limited weaknesses, such as a certain schematization in the comparative analysis and the relatively marginal treatment of aesthetic details. Overall, the study appears as a substantial contribution to literary memory studies, providing a viable set of tools for analyzing transgenerational memory and simultaneously opening up new perspectives for the exploration of future narrative forms.

➙ To the article

Francesco Petrarch and his followers: Étienne Anheim

Étienne Anheim's "Pétrarque: portrait de famille" (Minuit, 2026) reconstructs Francesco Petrarch's literary project as the result of dense familial entanglements and understands his work as a discursive "family portrait" in which genealogical construction, social embeddedness, and poetic self-stylization are inextricably intertwined. Based on a combination of textual analysis and archival research, Anheim demonstrates how Petrarch mythologizes his origins along a patrilineal notary genealogy, while simultaneously systematically marginalizing or silencing key figures—especially his mother, daughter, and the mothers of his children. The constellations of father (as a professional model to be overcome), brother (as a spiritual alter ego), Laura (as a real void, imaginary lover, and symbolic cipher of poetry), as well as children and friends, unfold as structuring relationships within which Petrarch shapes his authorial identity. Writing thus always appears as an addressed, fragmentary practice within an extended "familia" composed of relatives, correspondents, and literary successors. Anheim does not resolve the tensions between archivally reconstructible social history and literary self-presentation, but rather understands them as a productive site where Petrarch invents his own genealogy and simultaneously establishes the model of modern authorship—a model based on selective memory, symbolic reshaping, and the transformation of familial bonds into literary transmission.

➙ To the article

Israel, Gaza and the French intellectual discourse after October 7: Interpretive authority according to Denis Sieffert

This review analyzes the French intellectual debate following October 7, 2023, as a deeply polarized field of discourse in which three central positions emerged: a dominant pro-Israel camp, a marginalized pro-Palestinian spectrum, and a fragile, long-silent intermediate position. At its core is Denis Sieffert's book "La mauvaise cause" (2026), which is read as a committed counter-argument to what he sees as a hegemonic, pro-Israel discursive order. The review meticulously reconstructs Sieffert's argument—from France's historical entanglement with Israel and the analysis of media and rhetorical mechanisms to his critique of prominent intellectuals such as Gilles Kepel and Eva Illouz—and demonstrates that his central point of departure lies in the repoliticization of the conflict as a colonial issue. In comparison with Kepel's geopolitical-religious studies approach and Illouz's sociological critique of the Western left, the review highlights the fundamental epistemic differences between these positions: While Kepel and Illouz problematize the reactions to October 7th, Sieffert focuses on the mechanisms of discursive power and the rendering invisible of Palestinian suffering. In conclusion, the review assesses the book as an important, albeit not unproblematic, intervention that exemplifies the political, media, and moral fault lines of contemporary France.

➙ To the article

Bridging the gap and self-correction: Ernst Robert Curtius

Ernst Robert Curtius's "The Literary Pioneers of the New France," a product of the immediate postwar period born from the experience of political defeat, opens up a deliberately counter-movement, a European-oriented interpretive space. By presenting key French authors (Gide, Rolland, Claudel, Suarès, Péguy) as bearers of an intellectual renewal in 1918/20, Curtius engages less in neutral literary mediation than in a cultural-political intervention against national resentments and stereotypical images of France. This review highlights that Curtius's argument rests on a twofold movement: on the one hand, the deconstruction of the German cliché of rationalist, "Latin" France through the demonstration of transnational, and especially "Germanic," influences; on the other hand, the construction of a "true France" that can serve as a pedagogical projection screen for a renewed, European-oriented Germany. The tension between documented enmity (for example, in the case of Suarès) and its programmatic overlay through the idea of ​​Europe is not leveled, but rather read as a productive contradiction. The review critically highlights the book's selective approach and its philosophical hierarchy of values, which excludes certain currents of thought while normatively elevating others. Overall, Curtius's study thus appears as a project that is both bound to its time and methodologically groundbreaking: a rhetorically driven self-correction of national perceptions that places literary studies in the service of intellectual understanding.

➙ To the article

All the Guilty: The Pelicot Trial as Documentary Theatre by Milo Rau and Servane Dècle

Milo Rau and Servane Dècle have created an oratorio in 40 fragments from the trial material of the Mazan rapes, "Le Procès Pelicot," which transforms the historical criminal trial against Dominique Pelicot and his 50 co-defendants into a polyphonic theatrical document: indictments, witness statements, street interviews, psychiatric reports, feminist manifestos, perpetrator biographies, and SMS dialogues are assembled into a panorama that aims to reveal not the legal truth, but the deep social structure of violence. This interpretation traces how Rau operates on several levels simultaneously: poetically, through the choice of the oratorio as a form of meditative contemplation without scenic action; intertextually, through the framing with Petrarch's "Ascension du Mont Ventoux" as a critique of the male gaze; and dramaturgically, through the arrangement of the 40 fragments, which ranges from the external legal framework through perpetrator biographies and sociological analysis to feminist counter-arguments. The interpretation reveals that Rau's most powerful decisions are often decisions of omission: no pathos, no political class, no synthesis of open questions of justice. At the center is Gisèle Pelicot herself—not as a saint or icon, but as a political actor whose refusal to accept the hus-clos becomes the fundamental gesture of the entire piece and who, in the epilogue, beyond the 40 numbered fragments, has the last word.

➙ To the article

Between completion and silence: Antoine Compagnon

Antoine Compagnon's "La Vie derrière soi: Fins de la littérature" (2021) brings together the developed lectures from his final Collège de France cycle into a wide-ranging, essayistic reflection on the "ends" of literature—understood simultaneously as conclusion, goal, limit, and dissolution. Starting from the opposing poles of Roland Barthes (non-writing) and Marcel Proust (writing until the very end), Compagnon unfolds a poetics of late style that intertwines literary, art-historical, and philosophical discourses. Using a European canon—from Nicolas Poussin and Rembrandt to François-René de Chateaubriand and Samuel Beckett—the book examines figures of late-life work, of silence, of swan songs, and of last words, without reducing these phenomena to a single, unified theory. His central thesis, more demonstrated than explicitly formulated, is that literature is essentially a practice of finitude: it gains its meaning precisely in dealing with its own end. With the concept of the "aevum," Compagnon describes literature as a temporal form situated between individual transience and cultural duration, in which mortality and tradition intertwine. Thus, the end of literature appears not as its disappearance, but as its privileged enactment—as an art of taking leave that finds its form in the writing itself.

➙ To the article