From history to legend: Alexander the Great in Laurent Gaudé's work

Laurent Gaudé's "Pour seul cortège" (2012) radically shifts the historical Alexander narrative from the level of event-driven history to the threshold between death and afterlife. Instead of recounting the conqueror's well-known milestones, Gaudé focuses on Alexander's prolonged death in Babylon and the struggle over his body, which becomes the symbolic center of the novel. This essay argues that it is not Alexander as a historical figure, but rather his mortal body that is the true protagonist of the work: it is the embodiment of power struggles, the work of remembrance, and the question of the dead man's belonging. Based on an analysis of the polyphonic narrative structure, the dramatic form, and the mythically charged imagery of body, hunger, saffron, and wind, the text demonstrates how Gaudé transforms the historical novel into a tragedy of voices. Particular attention is paid to the figure of Dryptéis, who, as the antithesis to the power-hungry generals, embodies the transition from possession of the body to the preservation of the spirit. Furthermore, by comparing it to Gaudé's "La mort du roi Tsongor" (2002) and "Le Tigre bleu de l'Euphrate" (2002), it is highlighted that Gaudé continues a central theme of his work: the question of how the dead continue to live. The interpretation ultimately sees "Pour seul cortège" as a novel about the power of storytelling, which rescues humanity from transience and transports it into the realm of legend.

➙ To the article

Dismantling German-French historical myths in Eric Vuillard's récits

Éric Vuillard's "La bataille d'Occident" (2012) and "L'ordre du jour" (2017) are two narratives about war that tell the First and Second World Wars not as national histories, but as products of mutually intertwined Franco-German mythologies: The Franco-Prussian War of 1870/71 forms the structural horizon of both texts, from which the complementary self-images of both nations – the German mythology of rationality and the unstoppable military apparatus, and the French "élan" myth of the glorious offensive – emerge as traumatic reflections of each other. The essay argues that Vuillard's literary method essentially consists of a twofold deconstruction: firstly, he demonstrates that the supposed German efficiency is a bluff—the Wehrmacht's tanks are stuck in traffic on the road to Linz, Schlieffen moves paper figures across a yellowed map—and secondly, that French revanchism collapses in Joffre's culinary Alsatian fantasies, while soldiers in red uniform trousers march into machine-gun fire. The unifying explanatory model is neither national character nor political irrationalism, but rather capitalist interest and class logic: the twenty-four industrialists who financed Hitler in 1933 appear in Vuillard's work as the civilian continuation of the same accounting rationality that led Schlieffen to devise his plan of annihilation as a profit gamble. As a genre of Récit – a hybrid form between essay, historiography and novel – Vuillard practices an autopoetologically reflected poetics of the counter-archive, which sets the repressed names of the victims, the collapsed myths of the perpetrators and the continuing amnesia of corporations against the domestication of history into the folkloristic “déesse raisonnable” of a stagnant historical politics.

➙ To the article