Mathias Énard's "Le Banquet annuel de la Confrérie des fossoyeurs" (Actes Sud, 2020, translated into German by Holger Fock and Sabine Müller, Hanser, 2021) follows Parisian ethnology student David Mazon to the remote village of La Pierre-Saint-Christophe in the Poitou region. What begins as fieldwork unfolds into a coming-of-age story: David attempts to map the village using the instruments of Claude Lévi-Strauss and Bronisław Malinowski, compiling categories, transcriptions, and tables, while around him a reality pulsates that defies categorization. In parallel, a second, metaphysical level opens up: The souls of the dead return in ever-changing forms, traversing battles, religious wars, revolutions, and world wars, until they reappear in the present-day soil as worms, wild boars, or farmers. At its heart is the grotesquely opulent banquet of the undertakers' guild at Maillezais Abbey—a Rabelaisian orgy of food, liquor, and debate, in which death is not repressed but celebrated. In the end, the field researcher David abandons his dissertation and establishes an organic farm with Lucie: theory gives way to work, observation to participation. The essay demonstrates that this narrative arc does not stage an idyllic return to nature, but rather a systematic disempowerment of the academic gaze. Initially, the village appears as a "New Continent," its inhabitants as objects of study—an ironically fractured reenactment of colonial ethnography. But method and reality diverge: dialect, physicality, death, and labor undermine all conceptual order. Intertextuality—from François Rabelais to François Villon—functions here as a poetics tool: it relativizes the authority of theory by dissolving it into excess, the grotesque, and (literally!) metabolism. The interpretation sees the rural landscape in the novel as a palimpsest of world history, peasant practice, and the ecological present, in which death and fertility, decay and future are inextricably intertwined. Knowledge here arises not from distance, but from a connection to the earth—as a radical, political revaluation of what knowledge can mean.
➙ To the article