Song in Chaos: Apocalypse, Nomadism and Resistance in the work of Mathieu Belezi

Mathieu Belezi's "Cantique du chaos" depicts a post-apocalyptic world that has emerged from a biblically exaggerated flood event, and whose political and existential order is characterized by violence, emptiness, and uprooting: At its center is the aging desperado Théo Gracques, who, after a failed attempt to retreat as a hermit, flees with Chloé and her children across devastated Europe and America, while his present is incessantly intertwined with the lyrically condensed memories of his lost love Léonore and the death of their child; after further losses and increasing physical decline, his journey ends in a standstill at the Orinoco, where he dies and leaves his last poem to a young woman who keeps it in remembrance. The essay interprets this narrative arc as a triply structured poetics—between road novel, epic, and lyric cycle—in which being on the move is simultaneously spatial movement, the work of remembering, and the dying process. It precisely elucidates how Belezi, through the interweaving of a mythical opening hymn, prosaic chapters of escape, and poetic diary entries, establishes a "poetics of the end": writing here appears not as a representation of the world, but as the final autonomous act in a world without alternatives. The hybrid form is interpreted as a response to the depicted catastrophe—the baroque abundance of language against the emptiness of the devastated world, the lyrical transcendence of time against the linearity of decay, the female characters as bearers of action and tradition against the exhausted male narrator. By closely linking these formal and thematic lines, the review shows the novel not only as a dystopian narrative, but as a reflection on the conditions of literature itself: The “cantique” becomes the last, precariously continuing form of meaning-making in the face of total disintegration.

➙ To the article

The unreliable voice of colonial rule: Mathieu Belezi

Mathieu Belezi's novel "Moi, le glorieux" (2024) develops a delirious, monologic stream of memory from the fictional colonial ruler Albert Vandel, nicknamed "Bobby," who, in 1962—on the eve of Algerian independence—endures his 145-year-old, grotesquely exaggerated allegory of the entire colonial history in his fortified villa in Algiers. Starting from this besieged present, the text unfolds, in associative flashbacks, a century of colonial rule: the violent construction of the estate, the economic exploitation, the sexual control of women, the political self-presentation within the framework of colonial rituals, and finally the apocalyptic departure into the desert, which ends in the protagonist's violent death at the hands of those he had imagined as his "subjects." Central to this is the figure of Ouhrias, a young Algerian woman who, as a silent companion and resistant refuser of listening, both accompanies and subverts the monologue. The argument developed in this essay reads this novel as a radical experiment in narrative self-exposure: Belezi completely relinquishes the power of speech to the ostentatiously unreliable first-person narrator and refrains from any explicit moral commentary, so that the critique arises not from a dissenting voice, but from the exaggeration of colonial logic itself. The analysis demonstrates how this strategy operates on several levels: in the monologic narrative structure, which transforms communication into domination; in the temporal structure, which presents history as an unbroken continuity of colonial violence; in the constellation of characters, which systematically silences colonial subjects; and in the semantic fields of body, animal metaphor, and possession, which underpin the narrator's ideology. The essay particularly emphasizes the function of satirical exaggeration and the structural discrepancy between narrated self-perception and actual violence, which functions as a "satirical machine." Finally, the essay demonstrates that the novel also represents an autopoetological reflection, staging the colonizer as the author of his own story while simultaneously revealing the instability of this authorship. Taken together, "Moi, le glorieux" thus appears as a text that does not criticize colonial violence from the outside, but rather exposes it so radically in the mode of its own discourse that it discredits itself in the very act of speaking.

➙ To the article
Rentrée littéraire: contemporary French literature
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to give you the best possible user experience. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognizing you when you return to our site, and helps our team understand which sections of the site are most interesting and useful to you.